PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: date vs. strftime

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (3) saved test runs, The test labeled "date()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0014 seconds, (0.230% faster)

date() 100%
strftime() 99.77%

The date() test took 0.6119 seconds.
The strftime() test took 0.6133 seconds.


Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 126,591 loops for a total of 2,531,820 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000001) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 126,591 loops.
  • Total difference 1.41 milliseconds for 2,531,820 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.


The first test, "date()", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = date('Y-m-d \\a\\t H:i:s', $GLOBALS['t']);

The second test, "strftime()", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strftime('%Y-%m-%d at %H:%M:%S', $GLOBALS['t']);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (