PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: date vs. strftime

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (1) saved test runs, The test labeled "date()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0207 seconds, (2.822% faster)

date() 100%
strftime() 97.178%

The date() test took 0.7116 seconds.
The strftime() test took 0.7323 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 149,210 loops for a total of 2,984,200 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000007) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 149,210 loops.
  • Total difference 20.67 milliseconds for 2,984,200 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "date()", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = date('Y-m-d \\a\\t H:i:s', $GLOBALS['t']);

The second test, "strftime()", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strftime('%Y-%m-%d at %H:%M:%S', $GLOBALS['t']);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.25-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)