Historical ResultsBased on (2) saved test runs, The test labeled "date()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0121 seconds, (1.208% faster)
The date() test took 0.9868 seconds.
The strftime() test took 0.9989 seconds.
Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 274,258 loops for a total of 5,485,160 runs.
- Line execution difference (0.000002) milliseconds.
- Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 274,258 loops.
- Total difference 12.06 milliseconds for 5,485,160 loops
The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.
The first test, "date()", was:
for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++) $GLOBALS['dummy'] = date('Y-m-d \\a\\t H:i:s', $GLOBALS['t']);
The second test, "strftime()", was:
for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++) $GLOBALS['dummy'] = strftime('%Y-%m-%d at %H:%M:%S', $GLOBALS['t']);