PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: date vs. strftime

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (7) saved test runs, The test labeled "date()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0156 seconds, (1.832% faster)

date() 100%
strftime() 98.168%

The date() test took 0.8347 seconds.
The strftime() test took 0.8503 seconds.


Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 221,469 loops for a total of 4,429,380 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000004) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 221,469 loops.
  • Total difference 15.57 milliseconds for 4,429,380 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.


The first test, "date()", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = date('Y-m-d \\a\\t H:i:s', $GLOBALS['t']);

The second test, "strftime()", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strftime('%Y-%m-%d at %H:%M:%S', $GLOBALS['t']);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (