Test: date vs. strftime

No Description

View test history (1) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "strftime()" was the faster by 0.0099 seconds, (0.917% faster)

strftime() 100%

date() 99.083%

The strftime() test took 1.0718 seconds.
The date() test took 1.0818 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 251,268 loops for a total of 5,025,360 runs.

Line execution difference (0.000002) milliseconds.
Avg difference (0.496) milliseconds per 251,268 loops.
Total difference 9.92 milliseconds for 5,025,360 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (7.5573) milliseconds and Code 2 was (8.8030) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "date()", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = date('Y-m-d \\a\\t H:i:s', $GLOBALS['t']);

The second test, "strftime()", was:

for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy'] = strftime('%Y-%m-%d at %H:%M:%S', $GLOBALS['t']);

PHP Benchmarks