PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: create_function vs. eval

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (2) saved test runs, The test labeled "eval()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0043 seconds, (0.509% faster)

eval() 100%
create_function() 99.491%

The eval() test took 0.8333 seconds.
The create_function() test took 0.8375 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 219,796 loops for a total of 4,395,910 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000001) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 219,796 loops.
  • Total difference 4.26 milliseconds for 4,395,910 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "eval()", was:

eval('
	$x = 0;
	$x += 5;

	if ($x >= 5)
		$x = 0;

	$x;
	$x;');

The second test, "create_function()", was:

/*
$GLOBALS['dummy'] = create_function('', '
	$x = 0;
	$x += 5;

	if ($x >= 5)
		$x = 0;

	$x;
	$x;');
*/

$GLOBALS['dummy']();

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.22-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)