PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: using constants vs. variables

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (1) saved test runs, The test labeled "constants" was (on average) the faster by 0.0145 seconds, (3.208% faster)

constants 100%
variables 96.792%

The constants test took 0.4366 seconds.
The variables test took 0.451 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 104,271 loops for a total of 2,085,420 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000007) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 104,271 loops.
  • Total difference 14.47 milliseconds for 2,085,420 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "constants", was:

$GLOBALS['test'] = CONSTANT + 1;

The second test, "variables", was:

$GLOBALS['test'] = $GLOBALS['CONSTANT'] + 1;

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.22-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)