PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: using constants vs. variables

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (2) saved test runs, The test labeled "constants" was (on average) the faster by 0.0099 seconds, (1.235% faster)

constants 100%
variables 98.765%

The constants test took 0.7946 seconds.
The variables test took 0.8046 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 201,095 loops for a total of 4,021,890 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000002) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 201,095 loops.
  • Total difference 9.94 milliseconds for 4,021,890 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "constants", was:

$GLOBALS['test'] = CONSTANT + 1;

The second test, "variables", was:

$GLOBALS['test'] = $GLOBALS['CONSTANT'] + 1;

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.15-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)