PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: using constants vs. variables

No Description

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (4) saved test runs, The test labeled "constants" was (on average) the faster by 0.028 seconds, (3.372% faster)

constants 100%
variables 96.628%

The constants test took 0.802 seconds.
The variables test took 0.83 seconds.


Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 214,844 loops for a total of 4,296,875 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000007) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 214,844 loops.
  • Total difference 27.98 milliseconds for 4,296,875 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.


The first test, "constants", was:

$GLOBALS['test'] = CONSTANT + 1;

The second test, "variables", was:

$GLOBALS['test'] = $GLOBALS['CONSTANT'] + 1;

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (