PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: using constants vs. variables

No Description

View test history (4) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Saved

The test labeled "constants" was the faster by 0.0032 seconds, (0.618% faster)

constants 100%
variables 99.382%

The constants test took 0.5152 seconds.
The variables test took 0.5184 seconds.


Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 146,334 loops for a total of 2,926,680 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000001) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.160) milliseconds per 146,334 loops.
  • Total difference 3.20 milliseconds for 2,926,680 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.2744) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.1906) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.


The first test, "constants", was:

$GLOBALS['test'] = CONSTANT + 1;

The second test, "variables", was:

$GLOBALS['test'] = $GLOBALS['CONSTANT'] + 1;

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (