Test: pack v. sprintf

The documentation describes sprintf() using %c as similar to chr(). It's an arguably cleaner syntax (if only using chars) than pack() uses - is it faster?

View test history (1) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "pack()" was the faster by 0.0126 seconds, (2.472% faster)

pack() 100%

sprintf() 97.528%

The pack() test took 0.4967 seconds.
The sprintf() test took 0.5093 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 133,120 loops for a total of 2,662,400 runs.

Line execution difference (0.000005) milliseconds.
Avg difference (0.630) milliseconds per 133,120 loops.
Total difference 12.59 milliseconds for 2,662,400 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (1.3056) milliseconds and Code 2 was (1.5447) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "pack()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = pack('C4', 65, 65, 65, 65);

The second test, "sprintf()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = sprintf('%c%c%c%c', 65, 65, 65, 65);

PHP Benchmarks