PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: chr v. pack

Note that this test uses concatenation for many chr()'s vs. one pack(). In a case with many calls to pack(), the result might be different (but this is a less common use.)

View test history (2) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "chr()" was the faster by 0.0266 seconds, (2.431% faster)

chr() 100%
pack() 97.569%

The chr() test took 1.0669 seconds.
The pack() test took 1.0935 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 285,812 loops for a total of 5,716,240 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000005) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (1.329) milliseconds per 285,812 loops.
  • Total difference 26.58 milliseconds for 5,716,240 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (1.4958) milliseconds and Code 2 was (2.1722) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "chr()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = chr(65) . chr(65) . chr(65) . chr(65);

The second test, "pack()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = pack('C4', 65, 65, 65, 65);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.22-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)