PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: chr v. pack

Note that this test uses concatenation for many chr()'s vs. one pack(). In a case with many calls to pack(), the result might be different (but this is a less common use.)

View test history (3) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Saved

The test labeled "chr()" was the faster by 0.007 seconds, (1.086% faster)

chr() 100%
pack() 98.914%

The chr() test took 0.6347 seconds.
The pack() test took 0.6417 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 151,885 loops for a total of 3,037,700 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000002) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.349) milliseconds per 151,885 loops.
  • Total difference 6.97 milliseconds for 3,037,700 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (1.2401) milliseconds and Code 2 was (1.1633) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "chr()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = chr(65) . chr(65) . chr(65) . chr(65);

The second test, "pack()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = pack('C4', 65, 65, 65, 65);

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.15-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)