PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: chr v. literal

How much worse is chr() than just a literal (if it's cleanly representable.)

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (1) saved test runs, The test labeled "chr()" was (on average) the faster by 0.1167 seconds, (7.899% faster)

chr() 100%
literal 92.101%

The chr() test took 1.3609 seconds.
The literal test took 1.4776 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 289,063 loops for a total of 5,781,260 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000020) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 289,063 loops.
  • Total difference 116.72 milliseconds for 5,781,260 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "chr()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = chr(65);

The second test, "literal", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = 'A';

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.25-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)