PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: chr v. literal

How much worse is chr() than just a literal (if it's cleanly representable.)

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (4) saved test runs, The test labeled "chr()" was (on average) the faster by 0.0322 seconds, (4.311% faster)

chr() 100%
literal 95.689%

The chr() test took 0.7148 seconds.
The literal test took 0.747 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 170,362 loops for a total of 3,407,230 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000009) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 170,362 loops.
  • Total difference 32.20 milliseconds for 3,407,230 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "chr()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = chr(65);

The second test, "literal", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = 'A';

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.25-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)