PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: chr v. literal

How much worse is chr() than just a literal (if it's cleanly representable.)

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (4) saved test runs, The test labeled "chr()" was (on average) the faster by 0.009 seconds, (1.184% faster)

chr() 100%
literal 98.816%

The chr() test took 0.7496 seconds.
The literal test took 0.7585 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 204,522 loops for a total of 4,090,440 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000002) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 204,522 loops.
  • Total difference 8.98 milliseconds for 4,090,440 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "chr()", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = chr(65);

The second test, "literal", was:

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = 'A';

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.15-1+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)