PHP Benchmarks

Performance comparison of PHP code alternatives.

Test: array_merge vs. for (int keys)

The benefit of array_merge() is it doesn't overwrite int keys. But what if we do it manually?

Run this test again Return to test menu

Historical Results

Based on (4) saved test runs, The test labeled "for" was (on average) the faster by 0.0099 seconds, (1.860% faster)

for 100%
array_merge() 98.14%

The for test took 0.5224 seconds.
The array_merge() test took 0.5323 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 134,025 loops for a total of 2,680,505 runs.

  • Line execution difference (0.000004) milliseconds.
  • Avg difference (0.000) milliseconds per 134,025 loops.
  • Total difference 9.90 milliseconds for 2,680,505 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (0.0000) milliseconds and Code 2 was (0.0000) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "array_merge()", was:

$array = array_merge($GLOBALS['dummy1'], $GLOBALS['dummy2'], $GLOBALS['dummy3']);

The second test, "for", was:

$array = $GLOBALS['dummy1'];
for ($i = 0, $n = count($GLOBALS['dummy2']); $i < $n; $i++)
	$array[] = $GLOBALS['dummy2'][$i];
for ($i = 0, $n = count($GLOBALS['dummy3']); $i < $n; $i++)
	$array[] = $GLOBALS['dummy3'][$i];

Running: Linux (x86_64:1 GB) PHP (7.2.34-21+ubuntu16.04.1+deb.sury.org+1)