Test: array_walk vs. array_walk

Test: array_walk vs. array_walk_recursive

Does the recursive variant have any benefit over rolling our own recursion?

View test history (12) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "array_walk()" was the faster by 0.0295 seconds, (3.824% faster)

array_walk() 100%

array_walk_recursive() 96.176%

The array_walk() test took 0.7428 seconds.
The array_walk_recursive() test took 0.7724 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 179,148 loops for a total of 3,582,960 runs.

Line execution difference (0.000008) milliseconds.
Avg difference (1.477) milliseconds per 179,148 loops.
Total difference 29.53 milliseconds for 3,582,960 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (2.8552) milliseconds and Code 2 was (3.6731) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "array_walk()", was:

/*
function foo_manual(&$v)
{
	if (is_array($v))
		array_walk($v, 'foo_manual');
	else
		$v++;
}
*/

array_walk($GLOBALS['dummy'], 'foo_manual');

The second test, "array_walk_recursive()", was:

/*
function foo_auto(&$v)
{
	$v++;
}
*/

array_walk_recursive($GLOBALS['dummy'], 'foo_auto');

PHP Benchmarks