Test: array_map vs. array

Test: array_map vs. array_walk

array_walk() can change an array in place. Is this faster than creating a separate one with array_map()?

View test history (5) Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "array_walk()" was the faster by 0.0199 seconds, (2.294% faster)

array_walk() 100%

array_map() 97.706%

The array_walk() test took 0.8469 seconds.
The array_map() test took 0.8668 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 139,496 loops for a total of 2,789,920 runs.

Line execution difference (0.000007) milliseconds.
Avg difference (0.994) milliseconds per 139,496 loops.
Total difference 19.89 milliseconds for 2,789,920 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (6.8131) milliseconds and Code 2 was (8.2151) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "array_map()", was:

/*
function foo_map($v)
{
	return $v + 1;
}
*/

$GLOBALS['dummy'] = array_map('foo_map', $GLOBALS['dummy']);

The second test, "array_walk()", was:

/*
function foo_walk(&$v)
{
	$v = $v + 1;
}
*/

array_walk($GLOBALS['dummy'], 'foo_walk');

PHP Benchmarks