Test: array_diff vs. ==

Is using array_diff() better than an == check?

Run this test again Return to test menu

Result: Discarded

The test labeled "array_diff()" was the faster by 0.022 seconds, (3.114% faster)

array_diff() 100%

== 96.886%

The array_diff() test took 0.6829 seconds.
The == test took 0.7048 seconds.

Nitty-Gritty

Each test case ran 20 random code order iterations consisting of 151,528 loops for a total of 3,030,560 runs.

Line execution difference (0.000007) milliseconds.
Avg difference (1.098) milliseconds per 151,528 loops.
Total difference 21.95 milliseconds for 3,030,560 loops

The iteration variablity for Code 1 was (6.5691) milliseconds and Code 2 was (6.7540) milliseconds. The lower and the closer together there values are the more accurate the results are.

Code

The first test, "array_diff()", was:

for ($n = 0; $n < 20; $n++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = count(array_diff($GLOBALS['dummy'], $GLOBALS['dummy_pass'], $GLOBALS['dummy_pass2'])) === 0;
for ($n = 0; $n < 20; $n++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = count(array_diff($GLOBALS['dummy'], $GLOBALS['dummy_fail'], $GLOBALS['dummy_fail2'])) === 0;

The second test, "==", was:

for ($n = 0; $n < 20; $n++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = $GLOBALS['dummy'] == $GLOBALS['dummy_pass'] && $GLOBALS['dummy'] == $GLOBALS['dummy_pass2'];
for ($n = 0; $n < 20; $n++)
	$GLOBALS['dummy2'] = $GLOBALS['dummy'] == $GLOBALS['dummy_fail'] && $GLOBALS['dummy'] == $GLOBALS['dummy_fail2'];

PHP Benchmarks